p.s. I would say "double-check in Hollis," but, for the title that led to these discoveries, the Newspaper RR search tool had more accurate holdings info than Hollis did. (And even that was missing 7 years' of holdings.) Might have been just the one example, but it certainly argues for double-checking on the shelf. One theory (Burchsted and Harter 2013) is that some microfilms, although containing material dated prior to 2008, were received and processed during the period when serials holdings weren't being actively updated.
No comments:
Post a Comment